Twitter: Man the new Snow Patrol album ROCKS!!!

Rejected Again

Once again my image upload applications was rejected by the people at iStock Photography. However this time instead of rejecting my images out right they suggested I resubmit my images after editing them according to their suggestions.

Here is what they said about each of the three images.

Victorious

P1013497.JPG: Rejected
We found the overall composition of this file’s lighting could be improved. Technical aspects that can affect the overall quality of lighting are: flat/dull colors, blown-out highlights, harsh reflection, shadows or lens flares. These can all limit the usefulness of a file.

Kansas City from the air

P3234188.JPG: Rejected
This file contains artifacting when viewed at full size. This technical issue is commonly created by the quality settings in-camera, in post-processing or in RAWsettings. Artifacting may be the result of other factors such as excessive level adjustments.
some kid chasing seagulls

PA121685.JPG: Rejected
This file contains an excess of pixel discoloration when viewed at 100%, which we felt too severe and would affect the quality of print production.

The plan is to take their suggestions and try to improve them. Additionally I will be submitting work to other stock photography website.

One Comment

  1. Posted May 4, 2008 at 2:01 pm

    Clark, great new website…always nice to see a fellow photographer in KC. I wouldn’t stress too much over the stock thing. Their advice is certainly worth looking at and it is always great to improve and in turn sell photos but the business model is so rough. Collect your work and focus it. Find a niche and sell it yourself. You have quality work, there are a lot of good ways to get it in the hands of people without stock people taking a crazy % of the proceeds.


Trackback URL:

http://clarkgriffithsphotography.com/rejected-again/trackback/

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*